Greenpeace : Amazing new technology cuts CO2 emissions 99.5%
This new technology converts gases from industries burning fossil fuels into energy. Very cheap, visit www.absalutecology.com for more details.
The technology makes burning coal, oil, rubbish with nearly 0% pollution possible. Recycling has never been a more profitable and environmentaly friendly possiblilty then it is now. Spread the news and avoid a nuclear future. Not excatly sustainable living, but at least we’ll avoid the worst of climate change if we act soon. This technology cleans toxic gasses of impurities such as CO2, SO2, Nitrogen gas, and dust particles. Keeping the air clean at a very low cost.
This video is not directly supported by greenpeace, although its aim is to provide a simlar service as greenpeace, to protect the environment while accomodating the needs of human expansion and growth.
Absalutecology: Creating a solution to the global environmental and economic problem of air pollution.
Webby: http://www.absalutecology.com/
Just want to make clear that this video is nothing to do with Greenpeace. We have not reviewed and are not aware of this technology, and so cannot endorse it. To avoid any confusion we have contacted the company to request that Greenpeace’s name is removed from any publicity claims relating to this product…
thats true,but it is also true that carbon emmissions have increased dramatically over the last century, which is also not good in respect to he greenhouse effect
my god people,are you guys nutz, carbon emisitions are good for the earth, what do you think plants live on CO2, cut that down, and plants die, then , no plants, no air, no air, no mankind, my god, i cant believe you people are buying into this co2 B.S. co2 is part of nature, and if you believe mankind is responsible for its down fall your fooling yourself.
You can believe whatever you want, but burning 8 billion metric tons of carbon a year is increasing CO2 in the air by about 3 ppm a year, and will increase as the ocean’s ability to buffer CO2 decreases with increasing ocean temperature and increasing ocean acidity.
Plants take in CO2 to support all life on Earth. Since 2005, temperatures have gone down globally, as CO2 emisisons, and life on Earth, have gone up.
which covers around four fifths of the Earths surface. Many scientists agree that global warming/climate change etc. cannot be stopped as human activity makes up such a small fraction of pollutants in the atmosphere.
I believe that the emissions that are generated from factories and warehouses etc. make up a small fraction of the carbon dioxide (CO2) and environmentally-harmful gases that is in the atmosphere today (within 2-3%). The majority of the amount of harmful gases is from nature itself. The two main constituents are decaying vegetation, which creates carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4). The same gases are made by the vast oceans, through their expansion in heat and other scientific phenomena,
why do you use greenpeace name?
i want to say that if such invention is found we should spread it quickly in order t SAVE THE PLANET !!! i belive in humanity ps could please sb explain in plain words how far exactly from destruction?
To learn more about WORLDBANK plans =
google search YouTube video :
“PROTEST-Indigenous Peoples “2nd MAY REVOLT” at the UN”
Now put The Technology Into Cars And We Found Our Answer… IF The Technology Exist, Works And True….
That Country Economy Will Blow Up Cause oF That.
What you are describing is a perpetual motion engine. If it were real it would break the laws of thermodynamics. You can’t get more energy out than you put in. Splitting CO2 into carbon and oxygen will consume no less energy than you can get by recombining them. Ie: burn the carbon and you’re back where you started in terms of CO2.
Filtering the flue gases is a good thing, but you can’t make energy out of it.
Holy F**k …… I mean really HOLY HOLY f**K, thats is an Amazing invention
lolol borat is so funny
I have an M.Eng. on this stuff. Fro a moron, look in a mirror! A waterfall doe smolecular nuclear fusion. Safge, clean and cheap. Wtih no CO2, or the toxic death of present nuclear power. Go get educated, or wash your mind out with quick setting concrete!
You moronic person. Do you have any idea the radiation caused by Fusion? Not to mention it’s complete unbalanced reaction. It’s powerful enough to wipe out a country.
Even solar power gives of Sulfur emitions. There’s always a price to pay. Fusion’s price is just a little higher.
All life on Earth is supported by plants taking in CO2 - that is where the oxygen comes from. There is 0.00037% max CO2 in the air, 25% O2. And CO2 tracks the climate
Lets say Tommy the Terrorist decides to pay Numnuts Nuclear a visit. What then?
I say no thx nuclear, our atmosphere is polluted enough without the risk of ANOTHER Chernobyl. Either by accident or purposeful attack. We can hardly call any technology reliable. And these are deadly chemicals we are talking about, ones that dont break down for MILLIONS of years. I get enough risk of cancer from watching TV thanks. Let’s think sustainable and safe i say. Who cares about how many green notes it takes
Nuclear power do a lot of building! Ur is transported and processed a lot! Coal can be mined next to the power plant. Molecular nuclear fusion gets power from water, whic hrusn in pipes, and does mnotprodcue toxic death! Oh, adn it is free!
its a lie that Atom energy dont produce co2
u must know that Plutonium is a material what is like oil out of the earth, we must take it out transport it, this produce co2.
and dont forgett that the atomenergy is a problem for millions of years after use.
Nice Movie Guys - hes a legend! auctionswatch.com
though his experiment does sound very nice i doupt the highr powers that like to play god will go for it because there is no big money in it if you think about it. you make ten of them and the world is pure again what profite did they make off of it. ou can make more money from making the world worse off and thats how it goes unfortunatly
this could have some application in the future but not now Bush is a dipshit ok.Fusion or fision are good but u radiation and it’s after waste with it. unless you got a foot ball feild of dense lead laying around you go get your ***** killed. heavy water has deuterium oxide in it A RADIOACTIVE substance and is only made when a very large amount of water is boiled sea water i think???not sure…. do the math before you go eradiating the friggid planet there are always prices to pay
Nuclear fusion cuts CO2 by 100%, and your kettle does it as it boils!
Global warming is academic fiction and nuclear power public relations. You are stooges. Nuclear fusion gets power fropm water, with NO CO2 at all!